XLM Insight | Stellar Lumens News, Price Trends & Guides
You’ve probably seen the headlines, maybe even the little paper signs taped to the self-checkout screens at Kroger, glowing under the harsh fluorescent lights of the grocery aisle. "Kroger issues new checkout policy which will make it harder to pay for groceries," they warn. The U.S. Treasury is finally killing off the penny, and retailers are scrambling. My first reaction wasn't annoyance. It wasn't frustration. Honestly, when I first read about this, I felt a jolt of pure, unadulterated excitement.
This isn't an inconvenience. This is a system upgrade.
For decades, we’ve been running our daily economic lives on an operating system with a piece of buggy, obsolete code: the one-cent coin. A piece of code that, in 2024, cost the U.S. Mint 3.69 cents to compile for every 1 cent of value it produced. Think about that. We were willingly losing money on making money. It's the equivalent of a software company spending four dollars to develop a program they can only sell for one. It's fundamentally broken logic.
So when I see a sign asking for exact change, I don't see a problem. I see the beautiful, messy, and absolutely necessary process of patching our reality. We're finally deleting the line of code that says, "waste resources, slow down transactions, and cling to nostalgia for no logical reason." This isn't about making it harder to buy groceries; it's about making our entire system smarter.
Let's be clear: the penny is a dial-up modem in an age of fiber optics. It technically connects, but it introduces an absurd amount of friction into every single cash transaction. It’s the jangling weight in your pocket, the awkward fumbling at the register, the collective seconds and minutes lost every day across millions of transactions while someone hunts for a single, near-worthless copper-plated disc. The Treasury losing $85.3 million minting them last year is just the macro-level symptom of a micro-level inefficiency we all feel.
Now, some retailers are trying to figure out how to handle the transition. Kwik Trip, in a move I find genuinely elegant, announced they would simply round all cash purchases down to the nearest nickel. It's a "guest-friendly" solution that prioritizes goodwill and speed over pinching a few stray cents. Others, like Sheetz, have tried incentivizing people to bring in their penny jars. These are the early, ad-hoc solutions you always see during a major platform migration.

Of course, there are legitimate concerns. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond warned of a potential "rounding tax," where businesses that consistently round up could skim millions from consumers over time. And there are real compliance hurdles for retailers who accept SNAP benefits, which have "equal treatment provisions"—in simpler terms, the rules say you can't charge someone on food assistance a different price than someone paying electronically, and rounding cash transactions throws a wrench in that. But are these reasons to halt the upgrade? Or are they just bugs in the old system that the new one is finally forcing us to confront and fix?
This moment feels so much bigger than a coin. What we're witnessing is a tiny skirmish in the grand, ongoing battle between the physical and the digital, between legacy systems and future-facing logic. This is like the transition from horse-drawn carriages to the first sputtering automobiles. I imagine people back then complaining about the noise, the terrifying speeds, the lack of blacksmiths who knew how to fix an engine. They saw the immediate disruption, not the dawn of a new era of mobility and connection that would completely reshape society. The end of the penny is a small, but symbolically powerful, step in that same direction.
What does a world with less physical economic friction look like? Think about what this really signifies—it's not just about a coin, it's about a collective decision to value our time and cognitive energy over sentimental attachment to an obsolete piece of metal, and that mindset shift is the real engine that will drive us toward smarter cities, more responsive supply chains, and a truly seamless digital economy. It’s about freeing up bandwidth, both for the national treasury and for our own daily lives.
This is the kind of breakthrough that reminds me why I got into this field in the first place. It's the application of elegant design principles to the messy systems of human life. We have a responsibility, of course, to manage this transition with empathy. The "rounding tax" is a real ethical consideration, and we must demand transparent, pro-consumer policies like Kwik Trip's. We need to build new guardrails to protect the most vulnerable, especially those who rely on cash. The solution isn't to keep the buggy code forever; it's to write better, more humane code to replace it.
What other relics of a bygone era are we clinging to? What other sources of systemic friction have we just accepted as "the way things are"?
Don’t mourn the penny. Celebrate what its departure represents. It’s a declaration that we are willing to evolve, to streamline, to let go of things that no longer serve us. We are choosing to build a world that is a little faster, a little smarter, and a little less cluttered with the junk of the past. This isn't about losing a coin. It’s about gaining a clearer path to a future that is, quite literally, worth more than a cent.