XLM Insight | Stellar Lumens News, Price Trends & Guides
Let me get this straight. State Farm is simultaneously playing the victim and the bully, and they expect us not to notice.
On one hand, you’ve got a homeowner in New Mexico, Koteiba Azzam, whose house was wrecked by a burst pipe. He did what you’re supposed to do: he called his insurance company. The one he pays faithfully every month. State Farm’s response? According to his lawsuit, they sent someone out to do a half-assed investigation, denied the full claim, and left his property a wreck (State Farm faces lawsuit as homeowner alleges profit-driven claim denials). It’s the classic insurance story, the one you hear from your uncle at Thanksgiving. They’re happy to cash your checks, but when it’s time to pay up, suddenly they’re auditors from the IRS.
Then, you pivot over to California, and you see the other face of the `State Farm insurance company`. Here, they’re not the tough-guy adjuster denying a roof replacement. Oh no. Here, they’re Oliver Twist, holding out an empty bowl to the Insurance Commissioner, begging, “Please, sir, I want some more.” They’re asking for an emergency 22% rate hike because the big, bad wildfires hurt their feelings and their balance sheet to the tune of $7.6 billion (State Farm rate hike).
So which is it? Are you the ruthless corporate machine squeezing every last dime out of individual policyholders, or are you the fragile victim on the brink of financial collapse? Because you can’t be both.
Let’s talk about Mr. Azzam for a second. His story is infuriatingly familiar. A pipe bursts—a nightmare for any homeowner. You call your agent, the friendly face from the TV ads, expecting the “good neighbor” to show up. Instead, you get a systematic runaround. The lawsuit claims their investigation was "insufficient and unreasonable." That’s legal-speak for “they didn’t even really look.”
This isn't just about one guy in Sunland Park. This is the business model. The entire `home insurance` industry feels like a casino where the house always wins. They build these complex policies that no normal human can understand, filled with loopholes and exclusions. Then they use their own hand-picked "experts" to lowball the damage. It’s a slow, soul-crushing process designed to make you give up and accept whatever crumbs they offer. You ever read `State Farm insurance reviews` online? It's a horror show. And it's not just them; it's `Progressive`, `Geico`, all of them. They've perfected the art of profitable denial.
And for what? To save a few thousand bucks on a roof? To protect their profit margins? Is the financial health of this massive corporation really so fragile that it depends on nickel-and-diming a family whose home is water-damaged? The whole thing just stinks. It’s the kind of corporate behavior that makes you want to go live in a yurt. At least when a bear eats your food, it's honest.

This is the part that drives me crazy. The company that allegedly left a man’s home in disrepair over a water claim is the same one that now says its financial footing is so "precarious" that it could face a credit downgrade. A downgrade! The same threat a mobster uses: "Nice little mortgage market you got here. Be a shame if something... happened to it." It’s a hostage situation, and every Californian with a mortgage is the hostage.
Now let’s look at the big picture in California. State Farm wants a 22% rate hike, and they’re not even being subtle about it. They’ve basically told the state that even if they get it, they still won’t start writing new policies until they get an even bigger hike, maybe 30%. This is just business. No, 'business' doesn't cut it—this is a shakedown, plain and simple.
They’re using climate change as the ultimate excuse. The wildfires were devastating, no one denies that. But `State Farm auto insurance` and home insurance is a game of risk assessment. That's literally their entire job. For decades, they built their empires in places like California, collecting premiums while the sun was shining. Now that the predictable (and predicted) consequences of climate change are here, they act shocked. Shocked!
It’s like a man who builds his house on the beach, enjoys the view for 50 years, and then, when a hurricane finally washes it away, he demands the town pay to rebuild it on the same spot. It’s an abdication of responsibility disguised as a crisis. They want to use "forward-looking models" that account for climate change. Translation: they want us to pay for their past inability to look forward.
And where does this new money go, exactly? Does it go into a lockbox reserved only for California disaster claims? Or does it just get absorbed into the massive mothership, propping up profits and paying for another blimp to fly over a football game? We are definately never told. They want the benefits of a public utility—guaranteed rate hikes when things go bad—without any of the transparency or accountability. Then again, what do I know? Maybe I'm the crazy one for thinking a multi-billion dollar company should have a better plan than just sending its customers a bigger bill whenever it screws up.
Consumer Watchdog, bless their hearts, pointed out that State Farm’s parent company could probably pull some money out of its colossal reserves to stabilize the California branch. What a novel idea. Using your savings to cover an emergency. But that’s not how this works. The profits are privatized, but the risks... well, the risks are being socialized, one rate hike at a time. And they expect us to just nod along and open our wallets.
So here’s the bottom line. State Farm is playing two different games, and in both of them, you’re the loser. If you’re a small-time homeowner with a claim, they’re the house, and the odds are stacked against you. They’ll fight you over every two-by-four. But if they’re the ones who’ve made a bad bet on a planetary scale, they run to the government and demand to be treated like a public good that must be saved at all costs. It’s a perfect, closed-loop system of corporate enrichment, and we’re all just stuck inside it, paying for the privilege.